SHARE

The .222 Rem. cartridge, designed by Mike Walker of Remington, was introduced in 1950 in that company’s Model 722 rifle. The gun was only a couple of years old at the time, and it would soon be joined by others chambering the new cartridge. Sako, which began exporting its L46 rifle to the United States in 1949, added the .222 shortly after the gun’s introduction. My early example in .218 Bee has the thin barrel typical for those rifles, but my 1952-vintage .222 has the optional heavy barrel for that caliber.

Other rifles of both foreign and domestic manufacture followed, and finding an accurate one was not difficult. Among those I have shot through the years, Remington’s Models 722, 700, 600, 788 and 40X ranked highly in accuracy, as did several Sako L46 and L461 rifles.

The author and his custom Martini in .222 Super await the appearance of an unsuspecting woodchuck.

The Marlin 322 built on the Sako L46 action was quite nice, but accuracy was short-lived because of accelerated wear when its Micro-Groove rifling was subjected to jacketed bullets at high velocities. Other great .222s were the Browning Hi-Power and the Harrington & Richardson 317, both on the Sako L461 action, and the Anschutz Model 1533. The Savage 340 was the first economy-priced rifle offered in .222 Rem.

The .222 Rem. was the second commercially developed cartridge of its caliber to have a rimless case (the .22 Newton was first). And whereas most earlier .22 center-fires were descendants of existing cases of larger calibers, the .222 case was brand new. Early in its development, a 48-gr. bullet was loaded, but when performance on varmints proved to be unsatisfactory, a 50-gr. bullet with a thinner jacket became standard. A metal-case bullet of the same weight was also available. With a velocity of 3200 f.p.s., the .222 offered greater range than the .22 Hornet and longer barrel/accuracy life than the .220 Swift.

In addition to taking the varmint-shooting world by storm, the cartridge soon dominated a new shooting game called modern benchrest. Mike Walker, one of the founders of Int’l Benchrest Shooters, first shot the cartridge in competition at the Johnstown, N.Y., gun club during the summer of 1950. The rifle, built by him, had a heavy barrel and was on a Model 722 action. His five, five-shot groups at 100 yds. averaged 0.35″, which was not bad in those days. As the accuracy of rifles and shooters improved, so did the .222, with sub-quarter-minute groups eventually becoming commonplace. The .219 Donaldson Wasp, .220 Wilson Arrow and other favorites eventually faded away.


The rifle Walker used in that first match would evolve into Remington’s 40X target rifle. In .222 Rem., it was guaranteed to consistently average 0.45″ and smaller for five shots at 100 yds., making it the most accurate factory rifle available at the time. Up until about the mid-1960s, the 40X and custom rifles on the Model 722 action dominated benchrest competition, but they began losing the accuracy race with the introduction of rifles built around custom actions from barrelmaker Ed Shilen and several others.

Benchrest was not the only competitive game in which the “Triple-Deuce” excelled. In 1960, the Remington Model 760 pump gun in .222 was adopted by the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit at Ft. Benning, Ga., for use in 100-meter international running deer competition, where a moving target is exposed for only a few seconds. The highly modified rifles wore Redfield Int’l target sights and heavy, match-grade barrels. The first win came in 1961 when the Army team took gold during the double-shot aggregate at the world championship matches in Oslo, Norway. Back at Ft. Benning that same year, Sgt. Norman Skarpness won the single-shot (50 single-shots) championship while SFC Loyd G. Crow, Jr., took first honors in the double-shot (50 double-shots).


I doubt if many of today’s shooters are aware of the existence of a rimmed version of the .222 Rem. called the .222 Super. Martini-Henry rifles were used by various Australian armed forces and police forces beginning in 1871 with the .577/450 Martini-Henry cartridge and later ending with the .303 British. They were too large and heavy for comfortable use by young cadets at various schools and military academies, so a rifle on a smaller version of the Martini action was adopted. Chambered for a rimmed cartridge called the .310 Greener, they were manufactured by several English firms, including BSA Ltd.

When the Martini Cadet rifles became obsolete, the Australian government sold thousands to hunters and shooters in that country, many of which were converted to .22 Hornet and .218 Bee. Demand for higher velocity prompted the Super Cartridge Co. Pty. Ltd. of Maribyrnong, Victoria, to begin making a .222 with the same rim diameter as the .38 Spl. revolver cartridge. That made the case compatible with the extractor of the Martini rifle. Rifles were also exported to the United States where Ye Olde Hunter, a popular U.S. mail-order firm, priced a complete rifle at $15 and the action alone at $8.

After buying one of the actions, I learned that Williams Gunsight Co. of Davison, Mich., was importing .222 Super cases, and quickly stocked up. Then, my friend Dave Talley—an accomplished machinist and fine custom stockmaker who later made his mark manufacturing scope mounts—turned my $10 barrel blank from Herter’s, a stock and fore-end from Bishop, and a Unertl Varmint scope in 12X into in a fine little single-shot rifle in .222 Super.

The .222 Rem. is parent to other offspring as well, with the .222 Rem. Mag. introduced in 1958 being the first and the .22 TCM from Rock Island Armory being the latest. Others include the .221 Fireball, 5.56/.223 Rem., .17 Rem, .17 Fireball, .204 Ruger, .300 Blackout and the European-developed 5.6×50 mm Mag., which was introduced during the 1960s for use on roe deer.

There have also been a few wildcats with the 6×47 mm on the .222 Rem. Mag. case once used by benchrest shooters in Sporter Class where 6 mm and larger cartridges are required. It became popular enough to inspire Federal to offer unprimed, nickel-plated cases. Today the 6×45 mm is more popular due to the abundance of .223 Rem. brass. Black Hills loads 6×45 mm ammunition, and Les Baer Custom chambers the AR-15 for it. Also on the .223 Rem. case were the TCU line of unprimed cases in 6 mm, 6.5 mm and 7 mm.

Back to the .222 Rem., companies presently listing the ammunition include Federal, Hornady, HSM, Nosler, Prvi Partisan, Remington, Sellier & Bellot and Winchester. Plenty to keep the thousands of rifles out there active in the varmint fields, with one caveat. Production during the past few years has been devoted to more popular cartridges, resulting in a scarcity of .222 Rem. ammunition.

That should eventually change for the better, but in the meantime, the .222 has always been a great candidate for handloading. A top-ranked benchrest shooter who used a 50-gr. bullet once commented on using IMR-4198 for so long his powder measure adjustment was permanently stuck in place at 20.5 grs. Holding a strong second place in popularity was Bruce Hodgdon’s first lot of military-surplus BL-C. Its eventual replacement, BL-C(2), never became as popular. H322 and Reloder 7 have long been excellent choices and, as newer propellants go, Reloder 10X and VihtaVuori N130 are worthy of a try. CFE 223 is a good choice with 50-gr. and heavier bullets. Any good, small rifle primer will light the fire, but I am partial to the Federal GM205M and the CCI BR4.

When unprimed cases cannot be found, simply run .223 Rem. brass through a .222 Rem. full-length resizing die and trim to a length of 1.690″. Either virgin or once-fired cases should be used.

The .222 Rem. ruled over benchrest competition until the 1970s when it and the 6×47 mm were replaced by the 6 mm PPC. In the varmint fields it eventually lost out to the .223 Rem., mainly because cartridges adopted by the U.S. military have historically run roughshod over their competition. Those in the market for a new varmint rifle chambered for an extremely accurate and mild-mannered cartridge will logically choose the .223 Rem. due to more variety in factory ammunition and more availability of cases for reloading. But those of us who already own rifles in .222 Rem., and enjoy reliving the past, would not dream of switching.


A World Record Group

Despite the 6 mm PPC’s dominance in 100- and 200-yd. benchrest competition for nearly three decades, it has yet to topple the .222’s firm hold on the world’s smallest group. That accomplishment was shot by Mac McMillan on Sept. 23, 1973, during a NBSRA-sanctioned match at the Skunk Creek rifle range near Phoenix, Ariz. Chambered in .222 Rem., the 10½-lb. Light Varmint class rifle had an action built by Mac, a barrel made by brother Pat and a fiberglass stock made by another brother, Gale. Wally Siebert had bumped the magnification of its 12X scope to 24X. Custom dies were used to swage 50-gr. bullets using J4 jackets. McMillan’s load consisted of the Remington case, 23.5 grs. of Hodgdon BL-C (Lot No. 1) and an experimental primer made by CCI that would become the BR4.

McMillan’s five-shot, 100-yd. group was measured by match officials with a dial caliper modified by the addition of a clear plexiglass plate containing a .22-cal. reticle. All bullet holes in the paper target fit inside the reticle for an incredible group-size measurement of 0.0000. For the first time in recorded history, the perfect “one-hole” group had been shot in registered competition. The group was next measured with a special 60X microscope capable of accuracy to 0.0001, and it still came out at 0.0000. As required for official recognition, the target was then mailed around to seven members of the NBRSA records committee and they unanimously agreed on 0.009 as the size of the group. The group stood for 40 years until Mike Stinnett beat it by 0.002 with a 30 PPC in 2013.

—Layne Simpson


Those Rechambered .22 Hornets

During the 1950s and 1960s, practically every varmint shooter in the country wanted a rifle in .222 Rem. Factory rifles were available, but for less money that old .22 Hornet standing in the corner could be rechambered. And many were, not only by one-man shops, but by bigger operations such as Griffin & Howe. Two of the more popular for the conversion were Winchester’s Models 54 and 70. Whereas the rifling twist rate of 1:16 in their barrels was usually a bit slow for best accuracy with bullets heavier than 45 grs. at .22 Hornet velocities, the 50-gr. bullet originally loaded by Remington in the .222 Rem. was marginally stabilized in flight due to its higher velocity. Some rifles shot it accurately, others did not.

The Model 70 I have had for about 25 years (opposite page) is a standard grade with a 24 barrel. A previous owner had P.O. Ackley modify it soon after the .222 Rem. was introduced. Making the change required making a new magazine follower and modifying the bolt so that, as it moves forward, a hinged arm drops down to push the tiny .22 Hornet cartridge from a magazine capable of handling cartridges as large as the .375 H&H Mag. When enlarging the bolt face for the .222, the pusher was eliminated.

Barrel groove diameter of the Winchester rifles usually measures a nominal 0.223, and since they deliver acceptable accuracy with the 0.224 bullets of .22 Hornet factory ammunition, the same can be expected for bullets of the same diameter from the .222 Rem. The 1:16 twist does place limitations on bullet length. As an example, the Sierra 50-gr. BlitzKing measuring 0.780long is unstable in flight while the shorter (0.633 long) Sierra 50-gr. SMP is quite accurate.

Dropping back to 40 grs. and lighter is not a total solution because some are quite long for their weight, and only slight differences can matter. My Model 70 is extremely accurate with the Nosler 40-gr. FB Tipped that measures 0.670, but groups open up with the Hornady 40-gr. V-MAX measuring a slightly longer 0.680 and even more so with the 0.700 long Nosler 40-gr. Ballistic Tip. The Hornady 35-gr. NTX at 0.725 and the Nosler 40-gr. Lead Free Ballistic Tip at 0.780 won’t stay on a 16×16 target at 100 yds.

Other bullets that do work in my rifle are the Hornady 35-gr. V-MAX, Sierra 40-gr. HP, Nosler 40-gr., Varmageddon HP, the Sierra 40- and 45-gr. Hornet and the Hornady 45-gr. Hornet. The Hornet bullets from Sierra are available in 0.223 and 0.224 with the larger diameter being considerable more accurate in my Model 70 with its 0.2232 groove diameter.

If bullets of the two diameters are tried, use a Redding Type S full-length sizing die with interchangeable bushings and install a bushing 0.002 smaller than the neck diameter of a loaded round. To assure adequate case neck tension, the neck expander button of a sizing die made for 0.224 bullets measures 0.223 and it should be 0.222 for 0.223 bullets. This can be accomplished by reducing button diameter or by ordering one of the desired size from the die manufacturer.

Factory ammunition options for a 1:16 twist barrel are quite limited. The best I have tried is Nosler Varmageddon loaded with that company’s 40-gr. Flat Base Tipped bullet. No currently available .222 Rem. factory load with a 50-gr. bullet that I have tried delivers acceptable accuracy from my Model 70.

Source

Comments

comments

91 COMMENTS

  1. Have you ever considered publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog based upon on the same topics you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.|

  2. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!|

  3. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I to find It truly helpful & it helped me out much. I hope to give one thing back and help others such as you aided me.|

  4. Hmm it looks like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any recommendations for inexperienced blog writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.|

  5. Magnificent beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept|

  6. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I quite enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author. I will remember to bookmark your blog and may come back down the road. I want to encourage one to continue your great job, have a nice weekend!|

  7. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my blog so i got here to go back the prefer?.I’m attempting to find things to improve my site!I suppose its good enough to make use of some of your ideas!!|

  8. Simply wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is just nice and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the rewarding work.|

  9. Hi! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading your posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics? Thanks a ton!|

  10. Right here is the right website for everyone who hopes to understand this topic. You realize a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I personally would want to…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on a subject that’s been discussed for many years. Wonderful stuff, just great!|

  11. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great website and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.|

  12. Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The entire look of your site is wonderful, as neatly as the content material!

  13. Hey nice blog, just looking around some blogs, seems a pretty nice platform you are using. Im currently using WordPress for a few of my sites but looking to change one of them over to a platform similar to yours as a trial run. Anything in particular you would recommend about it?
    emu sale http://www.emusale.online

  14. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!|

  15. I’m really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems? A number of my blog audience have complained about my blog not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any recommendations to help fix this issue?|

  16. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this outstanding blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Chat soon!|

  17. Wow, amazing blog structure! How long have you ever been blogging for? you make running a blog glance easy. The whole glance of your site is great, as smartly as the content material!

  18. I really love your blog.. Great colors & theme. Did you develop this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting to create my own personal website and would like to learn where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. Many thanks!|

  19. Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I will come back yet again since I book-marked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide other people.|

  20. Hello there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!|

  21. First of all I want to say superb blog! I had a quick question in which I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was interested to find out how you center yourself and clear your mind prior to writing. I have had difficulty clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out. I do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be lost simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or tips? Cheers!|

  22. Hello i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anywhere, when i read this article i thought i could also create comment due to this good post.|

  23. Good day! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!|

  24. I just like the helpful information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check once more right here regularly. I’m rather certain I will be told lots of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!|

  25. I’m amazed, I must say. Seldom do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something not enough folks are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy that I found this during my search for something regarding this.|

  26. I do believe all of the ideas you’ve introduced in your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very short for starters. Could you please prolong them a bit from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.|

  27. May I just say what a relief to uncover someone who truly knows what they’re discussing on the internet. You definitely understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people should look at this and understand this side of your story. I can’t believe you aren’t more popular since you surely possess the gift.|

  28. Unquestionably imagine that which you said. Your favourite reason seemed to be at the internet the simplest factor to take note of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while folks consider worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , other folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you|

  29. Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to check it out. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding blog and amazing design.|

  30. I think the admin of this site is really working hard in support of his website, for the reason that here every information is quality based stuff.|

  31. Thanks , I’ve recently been looking for info about this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. However, what about the conclusion? Are you certain about the source?|

  32. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.|

  33. Your style is really unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I’ll just bookmark this page.|

  34. I’m not sure why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.|

  35. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account helped me a appropriate deal. I have been a little bit familiar of this your broadcast provided bright clear idea|

  36. Hi there, I found your website by way of Google even as looking for a similar matter, your website got here up, it looks great. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  37. Great post. I was checking continuously this weblog and I’m impressed! Very helpful information specifically the ultimate section 🙂 I handle such info much. I used to be seeking this certain info for a long time. Thank you and best of luck. |

  38. Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It actually was once a amusement account it. Look advanced to far brought agreeable from you! However, how could we keep up a correspondence?|

  39. Excellent blog here! Also your website loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol|

  40. I’m not sure why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.|

  41. Superb blog! Do you have any tips for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely overwhelmed .. Any tips? Cheers!|

  42. I am really loving the theme/design of your website. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A few of my blog readers have complained about my blog not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any ideas to help fix this issue?|

  43. What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site daily, this web page is actually nice and the users are really sharing nice thoughts.|

  44. I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both equally educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I came across this during my hunt for something regarding this.|

  45. When I originally commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I get 4 emails with the exact same comment. Is there a way you are able to remove me from that service? Appreciate it!|

  46. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I in finding It truly useful & it helped me out much. I’m hoping to provide one thing back and help others such as you helped me.|

  47. “Nice blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Kudos”

  48. “Helpful info. Fortunate me I found your website by accident, and I am stunned why this twist of fate did not took place earlier! I bookmarked it.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here